By: Francisco Marco-Serrano (K | P | K).
Following the comments of Pau " Futur Finances "in our previous post about the emotions at work , and my comment back in the wall of Pau on Facebook
I'm back to thinking about aforementioned equation, the "mathematical formula" in labor productivity at the micro level (company, employee). This expression is not trivial, since, based on research by our fellow economist Human Resources, Roberto Luna , this would be a mathematical structure on two levels, where job performance depends on job satisfaction and job satisfaction depends of how the company manages talent. According to the model that handles Roberto, MADE-C, this would be factors of leadership, shared values, growth and career advancement, personal responsibility and autonomy, and the pursuit of excellence in work by staff, and we, of course, would add management of emotions, which we believe is implicit variable in the model recursively.
.
Of course, we can find other more pragmatic models, how the Current Economic using its annual " Best Companies to Work For . " In this analysis, are being considered six factors: (Management) Talent, Compensation and Compensation, Environment (Labour), CSR, Education, and (opinion of) employees.
http://www.google.es/searc h? q = nap + in + the + work
Above all, because a firm that you can put a sofa for a nap, for sure he would be in line with the happiness of their employees ... and productivity.
Related Entries:
Tweet This Post 
Delicious 
Facebook 
MySpace
